jump to navigation

Chatham County Commissioners Approve 5-year Capital Plan January 30, 2010

Posted by Newt and Karen in Business, Life, News, Real Estate, Schools.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment
Commissioners Approve Five-Year Capital Plan With New High School
Posted Date: 1/25/2010 (http://www.chathamnc.org)

During its Board Summit on January 22, the Chatham County Board of Commissioners approved a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, which includes, among other things, a new high school in northeastern Chatham, a new jail, county-owned landfill site study, and moving ahead immediately with the judicial center.

“The commissioners feel that we need to move forward with the high school on Jack Bennett Road, even though this school was not recommended by the county manager. Recent school population projections did not take into account development that has already been approved, including Briar Chapel, said Commissioner Vice Chair George Lucier. “These projections were flawed and not useful for planning purposes.”

The approval of the plans to build the new high school by the commissioners is contingent on the Board of Education reaffirming their request for this new facility.

The high school, which would open in 2015, would have a capacity of 800 students, but the core facilities, such as the media center, cafeteria, and gymnasium would be constructed to accommodate 1,200 students so as growth occurs, the facility can be expanded.

The commissioners also directed the architect to continue finalizing the plans for the new judicial center. “We want to begin this project as quickly as possible, given the safety concerns and the crowded conditions at our existing court facilities,” said Commissioner Chair Sally Kost. “Acting quickly will also allow us to take advantage of current construction market conditions.”

The commissioners asked the architect to find ways to reduce the judicial center budget without impacting the function or general design of the facility. The commissioners trimmed the budget by roughly $4 million from the original estimated amount the county would have to borrow by taking advantage of lower construction costs and selecting other options for interior and exterior finishes.

“We can save substantial funds in the current construction market,” Kost said. “We also did what we could to reduce overall construction costs, but delaying this facility is not an option. As an example, District Court alone often has to handle more than twice the number of cases than it has capacity to handle during each session.”

The commissioners also approved a recommendation to fund a new jail, but asked county staff to work with a jail architect to reduce the total cost to $15 million, a reduction of 21%.

Kost said that the county can no longer ignore the needs for a new jail. “The data strongly supports the need for this facility.”

The Sheriff’s Office reported that the current jail is over capacity about 62% of the time, a trend that could create unsafe conditions and, down the road, the potential for the state to force the county to address the problem through more costly options.

As part of the capital plan the commissioners agreed to hire a consultant to look at potential sites for a county landfill. Kost said, “It is important to point out that this does not mean that any decision on the size or location of a landfill has been made, including whether or not it will accept only waste generated in our county or waste from surrounding areas.”

The consultant will look at sites that would accommodate 180 to 500 tons per day, so that the county can weigh its options. The smaller size would accept Chatham-generated waste only. The landfill site study will be paid out of existing capital reserves.

Related to this decision, the commissioners voted to delay the opening of a new waste collection center in the northeastern part of the county by one year to 2015, mainly because usage of the existing Cole Park Collection Center has actually declined in the past year.

The commissioners also added the following school-related items to the updated capital plan:

  • Replacement of roofs at nine older schools this year, using qualified school construction bonds to cover the estimated $2.2 million cost.
  • Replacement of indoor gym bleachers at Chatham Central and Jordan Matthews high schools, because existing bleachers are in poor condition and pose a safety hazard. The estimated total cost is $310,000 paid over two years (2011 to 2012) out of fund balance.
  • Improvement of lighting and sound for auditoriums at Chatham Central and Jordan Matthews so that all three high schools have upgraded auditoriums which will not only serve school functions, but will be able to accommodate many community activities. The estimated cost at each school is around $360,000.
  • Replacement of lights at Northwood’s football field. Existing lights do not meet standards of the NC Athletic Association, which means the school could be forced to play on an opponent’s field during a playoff game. The commissioners moved this project up one year to 2011. The estimated cost is $116,000 and will be paid from county reserves.
  • Replacement of broken or uneven paved areas at six schools, including sidewalks, driveways and play areas. Estimated cost is $150,000 over five years.

Other projects added or revised in the Five-Year Plan include:

  • Reductions in the scope of renovations at existing county buildings.
  • Improvements to Briar Chapel Park, a new park in a northeastern Chatham development. The park is expected to be donated to the county. Recreation fees paid by the developer will fund the estimated $300,000 needed to make improvements in 2010. The work includes restrooms, concession stand, fencing and more lighting. Community input from this past November will be considered in developing facility plans and operations of the park.
  • Minor improvements to Northwest District Park on Woody Store Road so that it is open for full-time use in 2011. Work primarily includes repairs to existing facilities, such as the picnic shelter, activity center, dining hall roof and kitchen, pool house roof, fishing pier, gym roof, and roads and driveways. Work also includes a new playground and barriers to protect walkway users from vehicle traffic. The estimated cost is $100,000, paid out of the parks capital reserve.
  • Improvements to the Law Enforcement Center site were moved up one year to 2011 so that the county can retain a $51,000 grant to help with the costs. It will provide additional parking and improved road access to the center, which is currently limited.

All of the new projects approved except one can be funded with existing borrowing capacity, capital reserves, fund balance, specified fees, grants and other revenues, according to Kost.

Building the new high school in the next five years means a potential property tax increase of 0.15 cents as of July 1, 2011 and an increase of approximately $700 in the school facility impact fee, effective January 1, 2011.

“To pay for the new high school, a slight increase in the property tax and an increase in the school facility impact fee will be necessary,” Kost said.

The commissioners explored various options regarding the impact fee, but tentatively approved an increase of around $700 to be effective January 1, 2011. As part of this impact fee decision, the commissioners made it clear that it included relief to builders by delaying the collection of the fee to a later point in the construction process. The fee is currently paid at the time of permitting. The change in when the fee is paid will be implemented January 1, 2011.

“We recognize that it is harder for smaller builders to pay the fee so early in the process. We can help by moving the collection of the fee to a point later in the construction cycle,” Kost said.

She emphasized that the commissioners would strongly prefer to fund all the critical needs in the five-year plan without any new revenues, but “we are dealing with a backlog of vital needs and have limited options to pay for them.” The impact fee can only be used for new school construction.

“It is important to note that legally we are not allowed to vary the level of the impact fee by the square footage or value of the home. Our hands are tied on those options,” Kost said.

She also noted that a 2009 study of the current school impact fee of $3,500 shows that the fee could be set much higher to reflect the actual cost of building new schools.

2010 Real Estate Sales to Increase November 18, 2009

Posted by Newt and Karen in Business, Life, News, Real Estate, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Good news!

According to REALTOR® Magazine, home sales will increase 15 percent to about 5.7 million units and REALTOR® income will be up 20 percent in 2010, NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun told a packed room of REALTORS® in a residential economic update at the 2009 NAR Conference & Expo.

Yun credited the home buyer tax credit with unleashing sales on the lower-end of the housing market this year, bringing up to 400,000 first-time buyers into the market who wouldn’t have bought otherwise. That influx tightened inventories of starter homes, shored up prices, and helped reduce households’ fear over continuing price drops.

This virtuous cycle will continue now that the federal government has extended the credit to mid-2010 and expanded it to make a smaller credit available to repeat buyers and to households with higher incomes. “The key is stabilizing prices and preserving household wealth,” he says.

The tightening inventory at all price points will help improve market performance by bringing supply into better balance with demand, but the added sales, particularly on the higher end, will also increase the number and quality of the market comparables used by appraisers to assign valuations. Once appraisals improve, foreclosures will ease, blunting their drag on the market and making it less likely that Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and even FHA will need help from the taxpayer.

“Then we’ll be set for a durable economic expansion,” he said.

New-home sales, which comprise about 10 percent of the market, will continue at suppressed levels–about 550,000 units, down from more than a million during the boom–mainly because builders have scaled projects way back, in part because financing isn’t available.

“Weakness in new-home sales shouldn’t be viewed as tepid demand,” he said.

Even under the most positive economic scenario, unemployment will remain elevated through 2010. Yun is predicting unemployment to stay near double-digits going into 2011, qualifying this recession, as some economists have, as the “Great Recession.”

For the longer term, the huge deficit run up by the federal government to shore up the economy remains the big question mark. Although the deficit is expected to improve each of the next three years, it will remain at historic highs. Unless the federal government releases a credible plan for shrinking it, investors will start to balk and interest rates will need to rise to bring them back. Should inflation be the result, the housing recovery will be set back.

Source: Robert Freedman, REALTOR® magazine

First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit Extended into 2010 November 9, 2009

Posted by Newt and Karen in Real Estate.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Plus … A New Tax Credit for Certain Existing Home Owners!

I know we’ve been away for a while but after a summer and early fall focusing on the family, we are back to blogging.

Here is some great news that I received from Mark Wooten of SunTrust Mortgage in Cary, NC.

President Obama has signed a bill that extends the tax credit for first-time homebuyers (FTHBs) into the first half of 2010. This program had been scheduled to expire on November 30, 2009.

In addition to extending the tax credit of up to $8,000 through June 30, 2010, the extension measure also opens up opportunities for others who are not buying a home for the first time.

So Who Gets What?
The program that has existed for FTHBs remains intact with the one exception that more people are now eligible based on an increase in the amount of income someone may now earn.

Additionally, the program now gives those who already own a residence some additional reasons to move to a new home. This incentive comes in the form of a tax credit of up to $6,500 for qualified purchasers who have owned and occupied a primary residence for a period of five consecutive years during the last eight years.

Deadlines
In order to qualify for the credit, all contracts need to be in effect no later than April 30, 2010 and close no later than June 30, 2010.

Higher Income Caps in Effect
The amount of income someone can earn and qualify for the full amount of the credit has been increased.

Single tax filers who earn up to $125,000 are eligible for the total credit amount. Those who earn more than this cap can receive a partial credit. However, single filers who earn $145,000 and above are ineligible.

Joint filers who earn up to $225,000 are eligible for the total credit amount. Those who earn more than this cap can receive a partial credit. However, joint filers who earn $245,000 and above are ineligible.

Maximum Purchase Price
Qualifying buyers may purchase a property with a maximum sales price of $800,000.

First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit – Frequently Asked Questions
Here are answers to some commonly asked questions about the tax credit.

What is a tax credit?
A tax credit is a direct reduction in tax liability owed by an individual to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In the event no taxes are owed, the IRS will issue a check for the amount of the tax credit an individual is owed. Unlike the tax credit that existed in 2008, this credit does not require repayment unless the home, at any time in the first 36 months of ownership, is no longer an individual’s primary residence.

What is the tax credit for first-time homebuyers (FTHBs)?
An eligible homebuyer may request from the IRS a tax credit of up to $8,000 or 10% of the purchase price for a home. If the amount of the home purchased is $75,000, the maximum amount the credit can be is $7,500. If the amount of the home purchased is $100,000, the amount of the credit may not exceed $8,000.

Who is eligible for the FTHB tax credit?
Anyone who has not owned a primary residence in the previous 36 months, prior to closing and the transfer of title, is eligible. This applies both to single taxpayers and married couples. In the case where there is a married couple, if either spouse has owned a primary residence in the last 36 months, neither would qualify. In the case where an individual has owned property that has not been a primary residence, such as a second home or investment property, that individual would be eligible.

As mentioned above, the tax credit has been expanded so that existing homeowners who have owned and occupied a primary residence for a period of five consecutive years during the last eight years are now eligible for a tax credit of up to $6,500.

How do I claim the credit?
For those taking advantage of the tax credit in 2009, you may choose to either apply for the credit with your 2009 tax return or you may apply for the credit sooner by filing an amended 2008 tax return with Form 5405 (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f5405.pdf).

Can you claim the tax credit in advance of purchasing a property?
No. The IRS has recently begun prosecuting people who have claimed credits where a purchase had not taken place.

Can a taxpayer claim a credit if the property is purchased from a seller with seller financing and the seller retains title to the property?
Yes. In situations where the buyer purchases the property, even though the seller retains legal title, the taxpayer may file for the credit. Examples of this would include a land contract, contract for deed, etc. According to the IRS, factors that would demonstrate the ownership of the property would include: 1. the right of possession, 2. the right to obtain legal title upon full payment of the purchase price, 3. the right to construct improvements, 4. the obligation to pay property taxes, 5. the risk of loss, 6. the responsibility to insure the property and 7. the duty to maintain the property.

Are there other restrictions to taking the credit?
Yes. According to the IRS, if any of the following describe your situation, a credit would not be due.

You buy your home from a close relative. This includes your spouse, parent, grandparent, child or grandchild.
You do not use the home as your principal residence.
You sell your home before the end of the year.
You are a nonresident alien.
You are, or were, eligible to claim the District of Columbia first-time homebuyer credit for any taxable year. (This does not apply for a home purchased in 2009.)
Your home financing comes from tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds. (This does not apply for a home purchased in 2009.)
You owned a principal residence at any time during the three years prior to the date of purchase of your new home. For example, if you bought a home on July 1, 2009, you cannot take the credit for that home if you owned, or had an ownership interest in, another principal residence at any time from July 2, 2006, through July 1, 2009.
Can you buy a home from a step-relative and be eligible for the credit?
Yes. Provided the person you are buying a home from is not a direct blood relative, the purchase would be allowed.

Can parent(s) who will not live in the property cosign for a mortgage for their child and the child that is a qualifying FTHB still be eligible for the credit?
Yes.

Can a separated spouse who has not owned a home for four years qualify for the FTHB tax credit if the spouse has owned a property anytime in the last three years?
No. However, the spouse may be eligible for the repeat buyer credit. The best path to take in any situation regarding income taxes is to speak with a professional tax preparer or CPA.

If you have any questions that fall outside the situations here, check with your REALTOR, mortgage broker, or accountant.

Thanks again to Mark for this great info.

Research Triangle, NC Area is one of the Nation’s Fastest Growing Metro Areas May 21, 2009

Posted by Newt and Karen in Life, News, Real Estate.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

According to data released from the U.S. Census Bureau on March 19, 2009, Raleigh-Cary, N.C., and Austin-Round Rock, Texas, were the nation’s fastest-growing metro areas between 2007 and 2008.  Data is based on to July 1, 2008 population estimates for the nation’s metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas and counties.

Raleigh-Cary saw its population climb 4.3 percent between July 1, 2007, and July 1, 2008, to 1.1 million.

Some other highlights of the report are as follows:

  • Large metro areas — those with 2008 populations of 1 million or more — were home to nine of the 10 fastest-growing counties.
  • All in all, 94 of the 100 counties (with a population of 10,000 or more) with the fastest population growth last year were in either the South (71 counties) or the West (23 counties). The remaining six were in the Midwest.
  • Among the 10 counties that added the largest number of residents during the period, four were in Southern California (Los Angeles, San Diego, Riverside and Orange), three were in Texas (Harris, Tarrant and Bexar), and one each was in Arizona (Maricopa), Nevada (Clark) and North Carolina (Wake).
  • Among the 100 fastest-growing counties, the majority were in Texas (19), Georgia (14), North Carolina (11) or Utah (nine). 
  • Twenty-seven of the 50 fastest-growing micro areas were in the South, 21 in the West and two in the Midwest.
  • Between April 1, 2000, and July 1, 2008, the fastest-growing metro area was Palm Coast, Fla., increasing by 83.1 percent. (Its single county, Flagler, was the second-fastest growing county.) Four western metro areas (St. George, Utah; Provo-Orem, Utah; Greeley, Colo.; and Bend, Ore.) rounded out the five fastest-growing metro areas. Three of the 10 fastest-growing metro areas had 2008 populations of 1 million or more: Raleigh (sixth), Las Vegas (seventh) and Austin (10th).

This information obtained from http://www.census.gov.

First Quarter Real Estate Statistics for Orange and Chatham County, NC May 1, 2009

Posted by Newt and Karen in Business, Life, News, Real Estate.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

The turmoil in the national financial markets during the third quarter of 2008 continues to produce scared consumers which in turn produce scared employees. The employed workforce has decreased and the unemployment rate has doubled. This is rare territory for the Triangle area. The current level of employment is the lowest level since March of 2006.  Job creation or loss is one of the main components in the local residential real estate market.

Here are some first quarter statistics for the Orange/Chatham area:

  • inventory levels increased 6% in Orange
  • inventory levels decreased 2% in Chatham
  • first quarter showings were up 27% in Orange from 1Q/08
  • first quarter showings were down 23% in Chatham from 1Q/08

Orange County is the only one of the main five counties in our market that had a higher level of showings compared to this time last year. This is a positive sign, however the level of contract pending sales continues to decrease. The number of expired and withdrawn listings has increased dramatically in both Chatham and Orange. These are sellers who have yet to adjust to current market conditions or do not have pricing flexibility.

The result has been a decrease in the amount of closed sales: down 27% in Orange, and down 25% in Chatham. The dramatically lower amount of closings has produced a higher current supply. Now is the time to be the buyer.

Data regarding house prices produces mixed signals. The average list price increased 4% in Orange and 1% in Chatham.  The average closed price increased 8% in Orange and decreased 7% in Chatham.

The market is heading into the part of the year that typically produces the highest amount of showings, contract pendings, and closed sales. Stimulus from Washington aimed at helping first time home buyers should provide a nudge to those sitting on the fence.

In Chatham and Orange County there is a great oversupply of homes in the 400K and up price points. There is no stimulus on the way to produce more buyers in this price segment. The oversupply in this and other segments in Chatham and Orange is expected to continue for an extended period of time. The lack of buyers in these price points is the main explanation for increases in the average list price.

The inventory situation in the 400K+ price points is not going to fix itself quickly. Many practitioners are searching for a bottom. There will probably be a bit more bottom searching before the market can begin to make its recovery.

This post is a summary of the Market Statistic Report, by Stacey Anfindsen, provided by the Greater Chapel Hill Association of Realtors to its members.

Green Home Tour 2009 April 21, 2009

Posted by Newt and Karen in Business, Events, Life, News, Real Estate, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

Tomorrow is Earth Day and this weekend kicks off the Green Home Tour presented by the Green Home Builders of the Triangle, North Carolina.

More and more homebuyers are looking for homes built to promote health, energy efficiency, and environmental protection.  Likewise, many builders are adopting green building techniques and these builders will be showcasing their green homes over the next two weekends, April 25-26 and May 2-3 in Chatham, Durham, Orange, and Wake County, North Carolina.

The Green Home Tour 2009 is a free, self-guided tour of sustainable homes in the Triangle area. Homes will be open Saturdays, April 25 and May 2 from 10 AM – 6 PM and on Sundays, April 26 and May 3 from noon – 6 PM.

Many of the homes feature top green technologies and features that may include:

  • GHBT certification
  • ENERGY STAR certification
  • limited turf areas, combined with native vegetation and preservation of natural areas
  • On-demand water heater
  • ENERGY STAR Low-E rated, rot-free windows 
  • ENERGY STAR appliances
  • No-VOC indoor paints
  • Motion sensors on outdoor lighting
  • Insulation surpassing minimum code requirements
  • Carbon monoxide detectors
  • Sealed ductwork

This event is sponsored by Stock Building Supply; The Home Builder’s Assocation of Durham, Orange, and Chatham Counties; and the Home Builder’s Association of Raleigh-Wake County.  The NC Sustainable Energy Association, in an effort to promote renewable energy, energy-efficiency, and green building, is also helping to publicize and sponsor this year’s Green Home Tour.

Please contact me for more information or visit my website.

You can also visit http://www.trianglegreenhomebuilders.com

Today’s Chapel Ridge Lot Auction — more info! April 18, 2009

Posted by Newt and Karen in Business, Events, Life, News, Real Estate.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Check out this video. Principal Broker and Auctioneer, Eric Andrews of Realty World Carolina Properties in Pittsboro, NC discusses today’s auction, a revolutionary concept for today’s real estate market.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNyxPHEfLIU

Chapel Ridge Community Lot Auction, Pittsboro, NC April 11, 2009

Posted by Newt and Karen in Business, Events, Life, News, Real Estate, Sights, Sports.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

When? Saturday, April 18 from 4:00-10:00 PM

Where? Chatham Mill in Pittsboro, NC

Registration begins at 4:00 PM. The auction will begin at 5:00.  Out of state buyers must register at least 3 days prior to the auction.

This is a one-of-a-kind multi-lot auction of one of Chatham County’s finest communities — Chapel Ridge Fred Couples Signature Golf Course Community.  Some reserves are significantly lower than the original purchase price and some lots have seller financing available. There are nature lots, golf course lots, Estate lots, basement lots, cul-de-sac lots, and more!

Chapel Ridge is an 800+ home site golf course community with amenities that include a clubhouse/restaurant, junior-Olympic size swimming pool, spacious gym, lighted tennis and basketball courts, volleyball court, amenity center, and lots of community activities.  Conveniently located, Chapel Ridge is only 15-20 minutes to Chapel Hill, Cary, Apex, and RTP, and 30-40 minutes to Raleigh and Durham.

Please contact Newt Heilman at ask4newt@earthlink.net  or at 1-800-615-6172 for a buyer package or for more information. Newt can also register you for the auction.

Now is the time to buy!

Why use a REALTOR? Part 4: Marketing a Listing April 7, 2009

Posted by Newt and Karen in Business, Life, News, Real Estate.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

An experienced, full-service REALTOR understands the market and can best promote the sale of your property. When marketing the listing, your REALTOR should

  • Create print and online ads
  • Install lock box
  • Coordinate showings with owners, tenants, other REALTORs
  • Prepare and generate “just listed” mass mailings
  • Prepare flyers and property marketing brochure
  • Review comparable MLS listings regularly to ensure property remains competitive in price, terms, conditions, and availability
  • Upload listing to company, agent, and advertising websites 
  • Advise Network Referral Program of listing
  • Provide marketing data to buyers coming from relocation and referral networks
  • Promptly convey price changes or any changes in listing data
  • Maintain flyers and information in property brochure and in MLS
  • Review and update loan information in MLS as required
  • Send feedback to buyers’ agents after showings
  • Discuss feedback from showing agents with seller
  • Stay in contact with seller weekly to discuss marketing and pricing

Some companies claim they can market your property for a flat fee and save you money by allowing you to choose the services you want. These companies may get your property into MLS, but they will not provide all of the services outlined above — services necessary to get your property sold in the most efficient and effective way.  Choose a full-service REALTOR. It will be worth every penny. 

Coming soon … Part 5 of this series will take on how a REALTOR handles Offer to Purchase Contracts and tracking the loan process.

Chatham County Residents Invited to Review DOT’s Proposed Corridor Plan for US 64 April 4, 2009

Posted by Newt and Karen in Business, Events, Life, News, Real Estate.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Chatham County residents have opportunities on April 27 and 28 to review and provide feedback on the proposed corridor plan for US 64 between US 1 in Cary and US 64 Business in Pittsboro. Long-term and short-term plans are proposed to guide development and improvements that would enhance traffic flow, safety, and pedestrian accessibility along the corridor.

The NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) will host two community workshops in partnership with the towns of Cary, Apex, and Pittsboro as well as Chatham County, Wake County and the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO).

Residents can stop by either of the community workshops any time between 5 pm and 8 pm. The information at both workshops will be the same, so residents can choose either of these two options:

  • Monday, April 27, 2009, Apex High School, 1501 Laura Duncan Rd, Apex, NC 27502
  • Tuesday, April 28, 2009, Horton Middle School, 79 Horton Road, Pittsboro NC 27312

The first series of community workshops were held in May of 2008. The upcoming workshops will include a chance to review and comment on:

  • The recommended long-term plan, which upgrades the highway by converting some cross streets to interchanges or overpasses, further controlling access, and removing traffic signals from US 1 in Cary to US 64 Business in Pittsboro. The recommended plan is a combination of the alternatives presented at the first workshop in May 2008. Simulations illustrating the long-term recommendations will be shown. 
  • The recommended short-term plan, which includes creation of a “superstreet” by restricting through traffic and left turns from cross streets, and constructing u-turns along corridor to facilitate these movements. 
  • Recommended land use changes, developed to ensure compatibility between land uses and the envisioned transportation functions

Representatives from the project’s Study Team will be at the workshops to provide information, answer questions, and accept written comments regarding the planning study. Chatham County Planning Department staff serves on the Study Team and will be at the April 28th community workshop in Pittsboro.

Additional information on the study can be found at http://www.ncdot.org/~us64study or you can contact David Wasserman, P.E. by mail (1501 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1501), by phone at (919) 715-1273, by fax at (919) 715-2858 or by email at dswasserman@ncdot.gov .

NCDOT can provide Spanish language interpreters and auxiliary aids and services under the Americans with Disabilities Act for disabled persons who wish to participate, but please contact Wasserman as early as possible to make these arrangements.

This information was obtained from a Chatham County, NC news posting at www.chathamnc.org

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.